Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Intra-articular Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IAHA) has been commonly used in the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA). This study sought to assess patient-reported outcomes (PRO) following different formulations of hyaluronic acid injections for patients who have knee OA. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who have knee OA and received IAHA knee injections from October 2018 to May 2022 in sports medicine (SM) and adult reconstructive (AR) clinics. Patients completed PRO measures including the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Mobility, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity at baseline, 6-week, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate changes in PRO measures between baseline and follow-up periods and to evaluate differences between the SM and AR divisions. A total of 995 patients received IAHA for knee OA and completed PRO assessments. RESULTS: There was no difference in the PROMIS measures based on molecular weight at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. Except for 6-month Mobility scores between the SM and AR patients (-0.52 ± 5.46 versus 2.03 ± 6.95; P = .02), all other PROMIS scores were similar. Mobility scores at 6 months were significantly different based on Kellgren and Lawrence grade (P = .005), but all other PROMIS scores were similar. CONCLUSION: Average change in PROMIS scores were significantly different only for 6-month Mobility scores based on divisions and Kellgren and Lawrence grade but did not achieve minimally clinical important difference at most timepoints. Further studies are needed to investigate whether improvement is observed in specific patient populations.

Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Forgotten Joint Score in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: In order to better understand the clinical benefits of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and improve the interpretability of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12), the establishment of a meaningful change in score is necessary. The purpose of this study is to determine the threshold of the FJS-12 for detecting the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) following primary TKA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent elective, primary TKA and answered both the FJS-12 and the Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey, Joint Replacement KOOS, JR surveys 1-year postoperatively. The questionnaires were administered via a web-based electronic application. KOOS, JR score was used as the anchor. The anchor for PASS calculation should relate pain, physical function, and patient satisfaction. Two statistical methods were employed: (1) the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve point; (2) 75th percentile of the cumulative percentage curve of patients who had the KOOS, JR score difference larger than the cut-off value. RESULTS: This study included 457 patients. The mean 1-year FJS-12 score was 42.6 ± 27.8. The mean 1-year KOOS, JR score was 68.0 ± 17.2. A high positive correlation between FJS-12 and KOOS, JR was found (r = 0.72, P < .001) making the KOOS, JR a valid external anchor. The threshold score of the FJS-12 which maximized the sensitivity and specificity for detecting a PASS was 33.3 (AUC = 0.78, 95% CI [0.74, 0.83]). The cut-off value computed with the 75th percentile approach was 77.1 (95% CI [73.9, 81.5]). CONCLUSION: The PASS threshold for the FJS-12 was 33.3 and 77.1 at 1-year follow-up after primary TKA using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and 75th percentile approaches, respectively. These values can be used to assess the successful achievement of a forgotten joint. LEVEL III EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Age and Gender Confound PROMIS Scores in Spine Patients With Back and Neck Pain.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center retrospective review. OBJECTIVES: To explore how age and gender affect PROMIS scores compared with traditional health-related quality of life (HRQL) in spine patients. METHODS: Patients presenting with a primary complaint of back pain (BP) or neck pain (NP) were included. Legacy HRQLs were Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). PROMIS Physical Function (PF), Pain Intensity (Int), and Pain Interference (Inf) were also administered to patients in a clinical setting. Patients were grouped by chief complaint, age (18-44, 45-64, 65+ years) and gender. Two parallel analyses were conducted to identify the effects of age and gender on patient-reported outcomes. Age groups were compared after propensity-score matching by VAS-pain and gender. Separately, genders were compared after propensity-score matching by age and VAS-pain. RESULTS: A total of 484 BP and 128 NP patients were matched into gender cohorts (n = 201 in each BP group, 46 in each NP group). Among BP patients, female patients demonstrated worse disability by ODI (44.15 vs 38.45, P = .005); PROMIS-PF did not differ by gender. Among NP patients, neither legacy HRQLs nor PROMIS differed by gender when controlling for NP and age. BP and NP patients were matched into age cohorts (n = 135 in each BP group and n = 14 in each BP group). Among BP patients, ANOVA revealed differences between groups when controlling for BP and gender: ODI (P < .001), PROMIS-PF (P = .018), PROMIS-Int (P < .001) PROMIS-Inf (P < .001). Among NP patients, matched age groups differed significantly in terms of NDI (P = .032) and PROMIS-PF (P = .022) but not PROMIS-Int or PROMIS-Inf. CONCLUSIONS: Age and gender confound traditional HRQLs as well as PROMIS domains. However, PROMIS offers age and gender-specific scores, which traditional HRQLs lack.

Implementation and early adaptation of patient-reported outcome measures into an electronic health record: A technical report.

We integrated and optimized patient-reported outcome measures into the electronic health record to provide quantitative, objective data regarding patients' health status, which is important for patient care, payer contracts, and research. With a multidisciplinary team from information technology, clinical informatics, population health, and physician champions, we used formal human-computer interaction techniques and user-centered design to integrate several technology platforms and computerized adaptive testing for the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. The patient-reported outcome measure system leverages software frequently used by health systems and provides data for research and clinical care via a mobile-responsive web application using Symfony, with REDCap for configuring assessments and de-identified data storage. The system incorporates Oracle databases and Epic flowsheets. Patients complete patient-reported outcome measures, with data viewable in MyChart and Epic Synopsis Reports. Researchers can access data portals. The highly usable, successful patient-reported outcome measures platform is acceptable to patients and clinicians and achieved 73 percent overall completion rates.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System instruments: outperforming traditional quality of life measures in patients with back and neck pain.

OBJECTIVE The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has become increasingly popular due to computer adaptive testing methodology. This study aims to validate the association between PROMIS and legacy outcome metrics and compare PROMIS to legacy metrics in terms of ceiling and floor effects and questionnaire burden. METHODS A retrospective review of an outcomes database was performed at a single institution from December 2016 to April 2017. Inclusion criteria were age > 18 years and a chief complaint of back pain or neck pain. The PROMIS computer adaptive testing Pain Interference, Physical Function (PF), and Pain Intensity domains; Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); Neck Disability Index (NDI); and visual analog scale (VAS) back, VAS leg, VAS neck, and VAS arm were completed in random order. PROMIS was compared to legacy metrics in terms of the average number of questions needed to complete each questionnaire and the score distributions in the lower and higher bounds of scores. RESULTS A total of 494 patients with back pain and 130 patients with neck pain were included. For back pain, ODI showed a strong correlation with PROMIS-PF (R = −0.749, p < 0.001), Pain Intensity (R = 0.709, p < 0.001), and Pain Interference (R = 0.790, p < 0.001) domains. Additionally, the PROMIS Pain Intensity domain correlated to both VAS back and neck pain (R = 0.642, p < 0.001 for both). PROMIS-PF took significantly fewer questions to complete compared to the ODI (4.123 vs 9.906, p < 0.001). When assessing for instrument sensitivity, neither survey presented a significant ceiling and floor effect in the back pain population (ODI: 0.40% and 2.63%; PROMIS-PF: 0.60% and 1.41%). In the neck pain cohort, NDI showed a strong correlation with PROMIS-PF (R = 0.771, p < 0.001). Additionally, PROMIS Pain Intensity correlated to VAS neck (R = 0.642, p < 0.001). The mean number of questions required to complete the questionnaire was much lower for PROMIS-PF compared to NDI (4.417 vs 10, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences found in terms of ceiling and floor effects for neck complaints (NDI: 2.3% and 6.92%; PROMIS-PF: 0.00% and 5.38%) or back complaints (ODI: 0.40% and 2.63%; PROMIS-PF: 1.41% and 0.60%). CONCLUSIONS PROMIS correlates strongly with traditional disability measures in patients with back pain and neck pain. For both back and neck pain, the PROMIS-PF required patients to answer significantly fewer questions to achieve similar granularity. There were no significant differences in ceiling and floor effects for NDI or ODI when compared with the PROMIS-PF instrument.

Relationship Between the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System and Traditional Patient-Reported Outcomes for Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is paramount to the creation of a value-based healthcare system that prioritizes patient-centered care in total joint arthroplasty. The relationship between global assessment PROs such as Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and joint-specific PROs for hip and knee, such as short form variations of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-JR) and Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-JR), has yet to be assessed. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted to assess PRO measurements for knee-related and hip-related complaints. The KOOS-JR and HOOS-JR were compared to the PROMIS computerized adaptive test (CAT) short forms (physical function, pain interference, and pain intensity) to assess their relationship. RESULTS: A total of 3644 patients completed 4609 questionnaires. A modest to strong correlation was observed between the KOOS-JR and the PROMIS CAT (ranging from r = 0.56 to -0.71, P < .05). A modest to strong correlation was also found between the HOOS-JR and the PROMIS CAT (r = 0.59 to -0.79, P < .05). CONCLUSION: PROMIS CATs demonstrated a modest to strong correlation with KOOS-JR or HOOS-JR. Future studies should further investigate the limitations of global assessment health surveys in capturing disease-specific changes following total joint arthroplasty.

The outcome of patients with cultured pathogens at time of nonunion surgery.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate incidence, preoperative laboratory markers, and outcomes of patients who positively cultured pathogens (PCP) at time of surgery for long bone fracture nonunion. Two-hundred and eighty-eight patients were enrolled in a trauma study on long bone nonunion. Two-hundred and sixteen of those 288 patients were cultured at the time of fracture nonunion surgery. Laboratory data were collected prior to intervention and infectious laboratory markers ordered on patients suspected for infection. Patients were followed for one year. Wound complications, antibiotic use, healing, function, and re-admission for further surgery were assessed. Cultures returned positive on 59 patients (representing 20.5% of the 288 patient cohort or 27.3% of the 216 patients cultured in the operative suite). More PCP's (47.5%; 28 of 59) developed wound complications, with greater mean antibiotic duration and more frequent returns to the OR averaging 1.3 procedures per patient. Twelve-month follow-up was obtained on 249 of the 288 (86.5%) and PCPs reported globally worse function. Patients who PCP at the time of operative management for long bone nonunion was a prognostic indicator of poorer long-term functional outcomes.

Does a Learning Curve Exist for the Surgical Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures?

BACKGROUND: The complication rate of locked plating for proximal humerus fractures remains stubbornly high. The purpose of this study was to determine if a learning curve exists with the operative treatment of proximal humerus fractures. METHODS: We prospectively followed 161 consecutive patients with proximal humerus fractures treated by a single surgeon with locked plates from 2005 to 2016. Radiographic data, functional outcomes, and complications from the surgeon's first 81 patients were compared to the subsequent 80 patients. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the rates of complications (p = 0.29) or screw penetration (p = 0.19). There were no differences in DASH scores (p = 0.64 to 0.79) or tip-apex distance (p = 0.40). Head shaft angles were slightly smaller in patients treated earlier in the surgeon's career (p = 0.02). DISCUSSION: While surgeon experience is certainly a favorable quality, there does not appear to be a significant "learning curve" in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures.

The Effect of Severity of Illness on Spine Surgery Costs Across New York State Hospitals: An Analysis of 69,831 Cases.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational database review. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of patient severity of illness (SOI) on the cost of spine surgery among New York state hospitals. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: National health care spending has risen at an unsustainable rate with musculoskeletal care, and spine surgery in particular, accounting for a significant portion of this expenditure. In an effort towards cost-containment, health care payers are exploring novel payment models some of which reward cost savings but penalize excessive spending. To mitigate risk to health care institutions, accurate cost forecasting is essential. No studies have evaluated the effect of SOI on costs within spine surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The New York State Hospital Inpatient Cost Transparency Database was reviewed to determine the costs of 69,831 hospital discharges between 2009 and 2011 comprising the 3 most commonly performed spine surgeries in the state. These costs were then analyzed in the context of the specific all patient refined diagnosis-related group (DRG) SOI modifier to determine this index's effect on overall costs. RESULTS: Overall, hospital-reported cost increases with the patient's SOI class and patients with worse baseline health incur greater hospital costs (P<0.001). Moreover, these costs are increasingly variable for each worsening SOI class (P<0.001). This trend of increasing costs is persistent for all 3 DRGs across all 3 years studied (2009-2011), within each of the 7 New York state regions, and occurs irrespective of the hospital's teaching status or size. CONCLUSIONS: Using the 3M all patient refined-DRG SOI index as a measure of patient's health status, a significant increase in cost for spine surgery for patients with higher SOI index was found. This study confirms the greater cost and variability of spine surgery for sicker patients and illustrates the inherent unpredictability in cost forecasting and budgeting for these same patients.

Resident Physician Duty-hour Requirements: What Does the Public Think?

INTRODUCTION: To date, no study has reported on the public's opinion of orthopaedic resident duty-hour requirements (DHR). METHODS: A survey was administered to people in orthopaedic waiting rooms and at three senior centers. Responses were analyzed to evaluate seven domains: knowledge of duty hours; opinions about duty hours; attitudes regarding shift work; patient safety concerns; and the effects of DHRs on continuity of care, on resident training, and on resident professionalism. RESULTS: Respondents felt that fatigue was unsafe and duty hours were beneficial in preventing resident physician fatigue. They supported the idea of residents working in shifts but did not support shifts for attending physicians. However, respondents wanted the same resident to provide continuity of care, even if that violated DHRs. They were supportive of increasing the length of residency to complete training. DHRs were not believed to affect professionalism. Half of the respondents believed that patient opinion should influence policy on this topic. DISCUSSION: Orthopaedic patients and those likely to require orthopaedic care have inconsistent opinions regarding DHRs, making it potentially difficult to incorporate their preferences into policy.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Distinct Shared Decision-Making Aids for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis in an Ethnically Diverse Patient Population.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of decision aids for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) regarding the potential risks and benefits of different treatment options. METHODS: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted of 147 patients with advanced hip or knee OA to compare the effect of two decision aids (booklet-only vs. booklet with DVD). RESULTS: Both decision aid programs were well received and demonstrated improvements in patient knowledge and willingness to participate in treatment decisions. The decision aids, however, had a marginal effect on patient willingness to participate in OA management, with an increase of 0.11 and 0.6 on a scale of 2 (P = 0.58) between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The decision aids were accepted for most patients and effective in improving patient knowledge and willingness to participate in the decision process. Nevertheless, the addition of a more expensive DVD to the booklet program did not improve patient acceptance or knowledge.

Performance Outcomes After Metacarpal Fractures in National Basketball Association Players.

Background: The aim was to determine whether players in the National Basketball Association (NBA) who sustain metacarpal fractures demonstrate decreased performance upon return to competition when compared with their performance before injury and that of their control-matched peers. Methods: Data for 32 NBA players with metacarpal fractures incurred over 11 seasons (2002-2003 to 2012-2013) were obtained from injury reports, press releases, and player profiles (www.nba.com and www.basketballreference.com). Player age, body mass index (BMI), position, shooting hand, number of years in the league, and treatment (surgical vs nonsurgical) were recorded. Individual season statistics for the 2 seasons immediately prior to injury and the 2 seasons after injury, including player efficiency rating (PER), were obtained. Thirty-two controls matched by player position, age, and performance statistics were identified. A performance comparison of the cohorts was performed. Results: Mean age at the time of injury was 27 years with an average player BMI of 24. Players had a mean 5.6 seasons of NBA experience prior to injury. There was no significant change in PER when preinjury and postinjury performances were compared. Neither injury to their shooting hand nor operative management of the fracture led to a decrease in performance during the 2 seasons after injury. When compared with matched controls, no significant decline in performance in PER the first season and second season after injury was found. Conclusion: NBA players sustaining metacarpal fractures can reasonably expect to return to their preinjury performance levels following appropriate treatment.

Feasibility of integrating standardized patient-reported outcomes in orthopedic care.

OBJECTIVES: Osteoarthritis of the knee is a chronic disease associated with pain and reduced quality of life. The ability to reliably measure patient-reported symptoms is important for clinical decision making and evaluation of outcomes. Electronic and web-based tools can eliminate much of the labor-intensive aspects of questionnaire administration and enables both real-time evaluation of responses by physicians and integration of data from multiple sites. This article describes the results of implementing a single integrated electronic questionnaire system into routine orthopedic practice at 2 diverse institutions. STUDY DESIGN: Case study. METHODS: A web-based version of a general quality-of-life questionnaire (EuroQol 5-dimension [EQ-5D]) and the pain domain of a disease-specific questionnaire (Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]) were administered in the office waiting room to (n = 666) patients at 2 centers over a 9-month period using touchscreen devices. Data were analyzed and descriptive statistics were calculated to assess feasibility of integration into the distinct work flows and to assess the agreement of the results. RESULTS: The electronic questionnaire had a completion rate of 93% to 95%. Average questionnaire completion times were 3 to 5 minutes at each institution. Mean EQ-5D and KOOS scores for patients pre- and postsurgery were also consistent with prior literature studies. CONCLUSIONS: Lessons learned for future adoption of questionnaire systems elsewhere include the need for baseline assessment of clinic work flows to identify the optimal point of administration and the need for IT support. This study demonstrates the feasibility of routinely collecting patient-reported data as part of standard care, which will become increasingly important as the nationwide emphasis on tracking quality and cost-effectiveness of treatments in orthopedics grows.

Does Risk for Malnutrition in Patients Presenting With Fractures Predict Lower Quality Measures?

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine if nutritional screening could be used as a predictor for the development of complications and hospital readmissions. METHODS: A variation of the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) score was collected for all inpatients with orthopaedic trauma on admission to our hospital from 2009 to 2011. We retrospectively compared each patient's MUST score with the subsequent development of infection, venous thromboembolism, respiratory failure, ulceration, or readmission. Finally, a chart review was performed to collect comorbidity data and evaluate Charlson comorbidity indexes to estimate the overall health of each patient with an available MUST. RESULTS: Of the 796 consecutive patients in our total cohort, 57.7% (n = 459) were of normal nutritional status and 42.3% (n = 337) exhibited at least 1 sign of malnutrition. In patients with normal nutrition, 2.8% developed at least one of the specified complications, and we observed a complication-to-patient ratio of 0.033. In patients with signs of malnutrition, 8.0% developed at least 1 complication with a complication-to-patient ratio of 0.101. This difference was significant (P = 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that each additional point in a patient's nutrition score corresponded to a 49.5% increase in the odds of developing a complication when controlling for other factors (odds ratio = 1.495, confidence interval = 1.120-1.997, P = 0.006). Charlson comorbidity indexes were not significantly associated with total complications when MUST scores used were a covariant. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated for fractures and dislocations with any sign of malnutrition according to the MUST score were more than twice as likely to acquire some combination of infection, venous thromboembolism, respiratory failure, or other reason for readmission than those of normal nutritional status. Increasing levels of malnourishment corresponded with increasing risk for developing complications, whereas these complications were not necessarily associated with higher comorbidity. An assessment of a fracture patient's nutritional status should be considered a factor in evaluating risks related to fracture care. The MUST score is a predictive tool. These data have important implications for hospitals whose fiscal reimbursement is dependent on the maintenance of defined quality measures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Sexual Function Is Impaired After Common Orthopaedic Nonpelvic Trauma.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and longitudinal improvement of patient reported sexual dysfunction after 5 common nonpelvic orthopaedic traumatic conditions. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Academic Medical Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: The functional status of 1324 patients with acute proximal humerus fractures (n = 104), acute distal radius fractures (n = 396), acute tibial plateau fractures (n = 118), acute ankle fractures (n = 434), and chronic long bone fracture nonunions (n = 272) was prospectively assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months of posttreatment. Patient reported sexual dysfunction, acquired from validated functional outcomes surveys, was compared with overall patient reported functional outcome for each follow-up visit. Men and women were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Sexual dysfunction at the 3-month follow-up was reported in 31% of proximal humerus fracture patients, 32% of distal radius fracture patients, 47% of tibial plateau patients, 11% of ankle fracture patients, and 42% of long bone nonunions. By 1-year follow-up, greater than 80% of patients with all fracture types reported mild or no sexual dysfunction. Women reported a significantly higher degree of sexual dysfunction than men at 6 months (P = 0.003) and 12 months of follow-up (P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: After treatment of acute and chronic orthopaedic trauma conditions, a considerable number of patients experience sexual dysfunction, with women reporting more dysfunction than men. The results of this study should allow orthopaedic trauma surgeons to counsel patients regarding expectations of sexual function after traumatic orthopaedic conditions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Correlation between physician specific discharge costs, LOS, and 30-day readmission rates: an analysis of 1,831 cases.

There is currently wide variation in the use and cost of post acute care following total joint arthroplasty. Additionally the optimum setting to which patients should be discharged after surgery is controversial. Discharge patterns following joint replacement vary widely between physicians at our institution, however, only weak correlations were found between the cost of discharge and length of stay or readmission rates. The inter-physician variance in discharge cost did not correlate to a difference in quality, as measured by length of stay and readmission rates, but does imply there is significant opportunity to modify physician discharge practices without impacting patient outcomes and the quality of care.

The effect of discharge disposition on 30-day readmission rates after total joint arthroplasty.

Previous studies have demonstrated no significant difference in overall functional outcomes of patients discharged to a sub acute setting versus home with health services after total joint arthroplasty. These findings coupled with pressure to reduce health care costs and the implementation of a prospective payment system under Medicare have supported the use of home rehabilitation services and the trend towards earlier discharge after hospitalization. While the overall functional outcome of patients discharged to various settings has been studied, there is a relative dearth of investigation comparing postoperative complications and readmission rates between various discharge dispositions. Our study demonstrated patients discharged home with health services had a significantly lower 30 day readmission rate compared to those discharged to inpatient rehab facilities. Patients discharged to rehab facilities have a higher incidence of comorbidity and this association could be responsible for their higher rate of readmission.

Tibial plateau fractures with and without meniscus tear--results of a standardized treatment protocol.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine what patient and injury factors are associated with the presence of a meniscus tear in tibial plateau fractures. We also sought to compare functional outcome, pain scores, and range of motion between patient groups with and without meniscal injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 99 patients with 101 acute tibial plateau fractures were included in the study cohort. Patients were divided into two groups: those with and without meniscus tears at the time of initial injury. Statistical analysis with Student's t-test for continuous variables and chi square test for categorical variables was performed to compare those with and without a meniscal tear. Logistic regression was performed to identify the variables that predicted the presence of a meniscus tear and repeated ANOVA measures were used to assess functional outcome scores. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients with 56 tibial plateau fractures (55%) were found to have an associated meniscal tear. The average amount of joint depression in this group was 12.3 mm (range: 2.0 to 29.5 mm). The remaining 45 patients with 45 fractures (45%) had an average depression of 5.4 mm (range: 0.0 to 12.8 mm). Degree of tibial plateau depression was the only significant predictor of meniscal injury. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that amount of depression in tibial plateau fractures is a significant predictor of the occurrence of a meniscus tear with an odds ratio of 1.36. We also found no significant difference in the functional outcome, pain scores, and knee range of motion between the group with and without meniscus tears at the longest follow-up interval. These findings suggest that acute repair of meniscal injury following traumatic fracture of the tibial plateau could produce functional results similar to those patients that did not sustain a meniscus tear.

Effect of spine fellow training on operative outcomes, affirming graduated responsibility.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected surgical data. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine the effect of fellow education during the course of the academic year (August-July) on surgical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. One surgeon and one type of surgery were chosen to minimize confounding factors. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Educating and training the next generation of physicians and surgeons is necessary for the survival and continuation of medical care. There has been recent momentum to document scientifically that medical education is safe. Spine surgery is complex and demanding, with a steep learning curve, making it an ideal model to detect any potential negative impact of medical education. SUBJECTS: adolescent patients undergoing posterior spinal surgery, between August 2007 and July 2010, by a single senior surgeon at one institution with a fellow as the only surgical assistant. Demographic and perioperative data were collected and then segmented by surgical date into quarters according to the rotations of the academic year. One fellow was included in each quarter during the 4 years, resulting in 16 fellows across the 4 quarters. An analysis of variance model was used to assess differences in operative time, blood loss, length of stay, and complications between the quarters of the year. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups regarding age, sex, or Lenke curve type. No statistically significant differences were found between the 4 quarters of the fellowship year for estimated blood loss, use of cell saver, length of stay, operative time, and complication rate. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to show that fellow education during the course of the academic year did not impact the patient outcomes studied. It is clear that while there is significant academic benefit for the fellows as they complete their spine fellowship, there is no negative impact for patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.